<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:activity="http://activitystrea.ms/spec/1.0/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Newsvine - Over Seas's Column - Articles and Seeds</title><link>http://markos-c.newsvine.com/</link><description></description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 02:27:20 +0000</lastBuildDate><pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 03:27:17 +0000</pubDate><generator>http://www.newsvine.com</generator><docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs><item><title>No, You Can't Keep Your Health Plan </title>
<description><![CDATA[Now, grain of salt first... the author is obviously from the right, but he's making some very interesting points that appear to be backed up by events that are actually happening.

Is this a good thing, or will the limitations be more of a detriment?]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Over Seas]]></dc:creator><source><![CDATA[Over Seas]]></source><link>http://markos-c.newsvine.com/_news/2010/05/20/4319934-no-you-cant-keep-your-health-plan</link><guid>http://markos-c.newsvine.com/_news/2010/05/20/4319934-no-you-cant-keep-your-health-plan</guid><category>health</category><pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 02:27:19 +0000</pubDate><activity:verb>http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post</activity:verb><activity:object-type>http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/bookmark</activity:object-type></item><item><title>New Zealand's expensive emissions targets &quot;not ambitious enough&quot;</title>
<description><![CDATA[Smith said the new targets were "economically responsible", citing government calculations that show that a 15 per cent reduction in emissions from 1990 levels by 2020 would cost each New Zealander NZ$1,400 ($942, £564) a year, or NZ$5,600 in reduced annual income for a family o&nbsp;&hellip;]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Over Seas]]></dc:creator><source><![CDATA[Over Seas]]></source><link>http://markos-c.newsvine.com/_news/2009/08/10/3139959-new-zealands-expensive-emissions-targets-not-ambitious-enough</link><guid>http://markos-c.newsvine.com/_news/2009/08/10/3139959-new-zealands-expensive-emissions-targets-not-ambitious-enough</guid><category>climate</category><category>change</category><category>world-news</category><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:09:05 +0000</pubDate><activity:verb>http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post</activity:verb><activity:object-type>http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/bookmark</activity:object-type></item></channel></rss>
